House, Skins, Yes, Minister
Mar. 3rd, 2010 07:26 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have recently discovered that Hugh Laurie and David Strathairn will be locked in a room together in a future episode of House. Actually, maybe I should word that statement like this: two of the three amazingly talented over-fifty actors with great big soulful eyes that I lust after like there's no tomorrow are going to be shoved in a room together for an episode of House. Squee!
I watched the first episode of series three of Skins. Sadly, I didn't find the new crowd particularly endearing. Worst bit was the writers having Cook, who is like an annoying cross between Tony and Chris minus their redeeming features, torching Sid's old locker. Not exactly the best move if the writers want me to like this guy, or not be at all bitter about their being no more Sid. I haven't given up of the idea of watching series three, but it may take some time.
What I have been successfully watching the show for which Margaret Thatcher allegedly wrote fanfic: Yes, Minister. Of course, I spent the entire time comparing and contrasting it with The Thick of It. Given the very similar set-ups of the two shows its hard not too.
It's actually quite fascinating not only comparing the political changes (Yes, Minster's all about the minister vs. the civil service with the media not that much of a focus, whereas TTOI is more the minister vs. the spin doctor/PM's all-powerful enforcer with the media having the characters constantly under siege, sometimes literally) but also how sitcoms have changed over the years (the very scripted, studio, Yes, Minister which could almost be a radio play and sticks to the genre, vs TTOI which tries to appear as unscripted as possible, with roaming camera work which allows for more visual humour and occasionally breaks out of it's genre and takes a turn for the dramatic).
Really, the best points of comparison are Party Games and Spinners and Losers in which both shows take on the storyline of the PM resigning and the search for a successor, which with Yes, Minister is carefully orchestrated and takes place over the course of a week or so, whereas in the latter TTOI episode it takes place over the course of one night and has the characters running around like headless chickens trying to correct or take advantage of the heir apparent's 'wobble' in support.
Comparisons aside, Yes, Minister, is freaking hilarious, and age doesn't seem to have affected it much at all. I haven't got around to watching Yes, Prime Minister yet though. I've actually just started on the first series of Star Trek: DS9.
Oh, and if there was an epic show down between Sir Humphrey and Malcolm Tucker, my money would be on Malcolm. Not just because he's far nastier (I'm sure Sir Humphrey would not take well to being shoved into a wall by an oxbridge-detesting Scot and instructed that if he doesn't do x immediately, he will have his balls chopped off and then preserved in a jar to be displayed in the lobby as an example for the rest of the civil service), but because Malcolm doesn't explain his schemes to underlings (it actually makes for far more compelling viewing that way as well).
I watched the first episode of series three of Skins. Sadly, I didn't find the new crowd particularly endearing. Worst bit was the writers having Cook, who is like an annoying cross between Tony and Chris minus their redeeming features, torching Sid's old locker. Not exactly the best move if the writers want me to like this guy, or not be at all bitter about their being no more Sid. I haven't given up of the idea of watching series three, but it may take some time.
What I have been successfully watching the show for which Margaret Thatcher allegedly wrote fanfic: Yes, Minister. Of course, I spent the entire time comparing and contrasting it with The Thick of It. Given the very similar set-ups of the two shows its hard not too.
It's actually quite fascinating not only comparing the political changes (Yes, Minster's all about the minister vs. the civil service with the media not that much of a focus, whereas TTOI is more the minister vs. the spin doctor/PM's all-powerful enforcer with the media having the characters constantly under siege, sometimes literally) but also how sitcoms have changed over the years (the very scripted, studio, Yes, Minister which could almost be a radio play and sticks to the genre, vs TTOI which tries to appear as unscripted as possible, with roaming camera work which allows for more visual humour and occasionally breaks out of it's genre and takes a turn for the dramatic).
Really, the best points of comparison are Party Games and Spinners and Losers in which both shows take on the storyline of the PM resigning and the search for a successor, which with Yes, Minister is carefully orchestrated and takes place over the course of a week or so, whereas in the latter TTOI episode it takes place over the course of one night and has the characters running around like headless chickens trying to correct or take advantage of the heir apparent's 'wobble' in support.
Comparisons aside, Yes, Minister, is freaking hilarious, and age doesn't seem to have affected it much at all. I haven't got around to watching Yes, Prime Minister yet though. I've actually just started on the first series of Star Trek: DS9.
Oh, and if there was an epic show down between Sir Humphrey and Malcolm Tucker, my money would be on Malcolm. Not just because he's far nastier (I'm sure Sir Humphrey would not take well to being shoved into a wall by an oxbridge-detesting Scot and instructed that if he doesn't do x immediately, he will have his balls chopped off and then preserved in a jar to be displayed in the lobby as an example for the rest of the civil service), but because Malcolm doesn't explain his schemes to underlings (it actually makes for far more compelling viewing that way as well).
no subject
Date: 2010-03-03 07:54 am (UTC)b) I adore Yes, Minister (and Yes, Prime Minister) and have never even heard of The Thick of It, but now, obviously, I will need to get my hands on it pronto.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-03 08:27 am (UTC)There's a trailer for the third series here (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUxNWrUU1C4) if you want an idea of what it's like.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-03 06:40 pm (UTC)I suppose one reason is because it is never specific about which party it is. Whereas while I do like the thick of it, it's always been clear the government's labour and *really* clear the opposition are the tories.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-03 08:08 pm (UTC)I dunno about the party not being obvious, with Jim's manifesto and obsession being the cutting down of government departments and expenditures, that's a pretty common promise for right wing parties to make. But, you're right, in TTOI it is far more obvious which party is which.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-03 07:34 pm (UTC)I've seen some Cook clips and found him a bit annoying, but that makes me super sad. Honestly, the thing keeping me from watching it most isn't even loyalty, but Effy being at the center of a love triangle. It's fucking Effy. She is so beyond your petty romantic complications.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-03 08:14 pm (UTC)That's one of the things I'm dreading, what they've apparently done with Effy's character. They should have kept her on the periphery, stepping in once a series and being fantastically Effy. There are some characters for which less is more, she's one of them.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-03 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-04 12:58 am (UTC)I don't see her as interested in committing at this point in her life.
Neither. I can understand the writers wanting to have Effy move away from being an observer and join humanity, but I don't think it would happen when she's still a teenager, more like when she's in her thirties maybe, and it'd take someone far more interesting than any of the other characters on the show to entice her to make that move.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-04 07:48 am (UTC)True, true. I think that's more of the way of approaching her character now that she's a main than a fundamental problem of her being a main character. But maybe that's just 'cause I have a specific omg has her shit together (on that front) vision of her. She has vulnerabilities, but I don't believe she's the type of person where those vulnerabilities would cripple her into ineptitude/indecisiveness. Pulling away completely and going about her business away from everything else, sure.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-04 12:27 am (UTC)Hmmm... which should I start with first Yes, Minister or Yes, Prime Minister?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-04 12:48 am (UTC)Yes, Prime Minister follows on from Yes, Minister, so it's probably best if you start with Yes, Minister first.