PIC Donna is not a Revelation
Apr. 8th, 2008 07:43 pmIt’s kind of cool sitting back and seeing a good portion of Who fandom realise, that no, Catherine Tate is not going to be the end of the show, and yes, Donna really is quite excellent. On the other hand, a few things about the way people are realising this are bugging me – particularly when people go on about how much Donna has improved since The Runaway Bride.
Thing is:
1. Donna did not scream all the way through The Runaway Bride. She did do an awful lot of yelling throughout the first sixteen minutes (yes, I timed it) – however, yelling loudly is a perfectly valid response to being abducted by aliens while walking down the aisle on your wedding day and then being kidnapped by robot Santas and forced to jump out of a moving vehicle on a motorway.
2. The quiet contemplative Donna that we saw with her Grandfather in Partners in Crime, made two wonderful appearances in TRB. Firstly, at minute sixteen (i.e. at the quarter way though the episode point), in the rooftop scene, and then later in the final scene of the show. Quiet contemplative Donna is not a new invention for Partners in Crime. She already existed.
3. And another thing, why is yelling every now and again a bad thing? The criticism smacks of sexism for me, and always has – as if a woman should be seen and not heard. The Doctor can be loud and ranty every now and again and while we moan about this sometimes, we don’t ever name it as our number one reason why he shouldn’t be a main character.
4. Catherine Tate did not just learn how to act. She was quite magnificent in The Runaway Bride as well. And, strangely enough, she managed to get through that episode as without using a catchphrase as well. The fact that anyone assumed that she would be anything less than a professional actor and force RTD to turn Donna into Lauren Cooper is ridiculous at best and insulting at worst.
Donna has not had a personality overhaul. The only particular change in Donna between the beginning of TRB and the beginning of PIC is that she’s warmed to the Doctor, revamped her outlook on the world and has a new set of priorities, which make her more appealing to the audience. And of course, the brilliance of The Runaway Bride is that we get to witness this character development over the course of the episode. There is very little difference between the Donna at the end of TRB and the Donna we see again in PIC
Okay, rant over (sorry f-list, I know I’m preaching to the converted, but I needed to get it off my chest).
Thing is:
1. Donna did not scream all the way through The Runaway Bride. She did do an awful lot of yelling throughout the first sixteen minutes (yes, I timed it) – however, yelling loudly is a perfectly valid response to being abducted by aliens while walking down the aisle on your wedding day and then being kidnapped by robot Santas and forced to jump out of a moving vehicle on a motorway.
2. The quiet contemplative Donna that we saw with her Grandfather in Partners in Crime, made two wonderful appearances in TRB. Firstly, at minute sixteen (i.e. at the quarter way though the episode point), in the rooftop scene, and then later in the final scene of the show. Quiet contemplative Donna is not a new invention for Partners in Crime. She already existed.
3. And another thing, why is yelling every now and again a bad thing? The criticism smacks of sexism for me, and always has – as if a woman should be seen and not heard. The Doctor can be loud and ranty every now and again and while we moan about this sometimes, we don’t ever name it as our number one reason why he shouldn’t be a main character.
4. Catherine Tate did not just learn how to act. She was quite magnificent in The Runaway Bride as well. And, strangely enough, she managed to get through that episode as without using a catchphrase as well. The fact that anyone assumed that she would be anything less than a professional actor and force RTD to turn Donna into Lauren Cooper is ridiculous at best and insulting at worst.
Donna has not had a personality overhaul. The only particular change in Donna between the beginning of TRB and the beginning of PIC is that she’s warmed to the Doctor, revamped her outlook on the world and has a new set of priorities, which make her more appealing to the audience. And of course, the brilliance of The Runaway Bride is that we get to witness this character development over the course of the episode. There is very little difference between the Donna at the end of TRB and the Donna we see again in PIC
Okay, rant over (sorry f-list, I know I’m preaching to the converted, but I needed to get it off my chest).
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 08:23 am (UTC)CT was a member of the RSC at one point. You don't get asked to work with them if you're a one note performer who only does funny voices. I've also seen her in other non-comedic roles and she's excellent.
I think that there is a change in Donna from TRB to PiC -- because it's been over a year since she saw the Doctor, she's already been through an ordeal with him once and she has changed her life around. She is a bit more quiet/contemplative because it's different circumstances! I'd say the biggest change in her (which oddly no one has commented on) is that she's gone from being ignorant and clueless to being a lot more resourceful - again, due to her past time with the Doctor.
Donna is brash. Donna is loud. Donna is her own person. She's got a different personality than Rose or Martha or Astrid. People seem to forget that Sarah Jane's first exchange with the Doctor was telling him off and saying 'I'm not the tea lady'.
And yes, it does hint at sexism, esp since Donna's "old" and "fat" and "ugly" by too many people's standards (because she's not 19, anorexic and a pop tart, apparently). If she was all of those, I guess she'd be allowed to be loud and obnoxious, right?
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 08:46 am (UTC)And I do love how resourceful she was in PIC. And incredibly Sarah Jane-esq. You're right, there are quite a lot of similarities between Donna's introduction and Sarah's introduction, and Donna's investigation of Adipose Industries reminded me so much of Sarah Jane (there's that thing going around at the moment, that Rose=Jo, Martha=Liz and Donna=Sarah, and I completely agree with it).
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:27 am (UTC)I think the defining moment for me was when he was dealing with the Adipose machine thingee (sorry, it's 5:20 am and I can't remember the name of it) and had decided he failed and she simply said 'What do you need?' and wouldn't let go until she got a reasonable answer. She didn't shriek at him. She wasn't a nag. She just was forceful and didn't let him get away with it. Which was brilliant.
I think too many people want to turn her into a modern day Tegan which is just wrong. Tegan was an awful character because she was written and played as a shrew who only knew how to bitch, moan and be contrary. At least that's my memory of her -- I might have a better opinion of her now. But RTD is not JNT (thankfully) and can actually create 3 dimensional characters.
Oh, I hadn't see that thing but it's a fair assessment. Although I like Jo better than Rose any day and Sarah was a bit more accomplished than Donna (i.e. SJS wasn't a 40 yr old spinster who was just discovering her life -- she was always resourceful and spunky, well as much as she could be on 1975 television, and had better people skills). But it's a decent analogy nonetheless.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:05 pm (UTC)I get the Rose=New!Jo (some definite character and arc similarities), Martha=New!Liz, Donna=New!Sarah (especially with the sneaky investigative skillz) analogy, but when I thought about it, the analogy that makes more sense to me is Rose=New!Peri (coming from me, that's actually quite complimentary to Rose; I think they relate to the things they see on similar playful, regular girl sort of ways, and are young and looking for experiences and have similar rapport with the Doctor), Martha=New!Barbara (I saw this and thought it was really accurate), Donna=New!Tegan (highly complimentary to Tegan; I try to hook onto the attributes of all of them).
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 08:46 am (UTC)If she was, she'd probably be "uppity" and "arrogant" like Martha. *hates on people a bit*
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 08:53 am (UTC)*Goes off to bang her head against a hard surface*
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 08:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:22 am (UTC)I don't know if it's enough to know the next companion of colour will have an easier ride. I love Freema a lot, and I want her to go on and have a magnificent career, just to spite the haters.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:32 am (UTC)I don't care what the haters say -- Freema is magnificent and isn't going to just disappear because they think she should. I am really hoping Martha gets to bop between DW, SJA and TW over the next few years and that Freema gets other work on top of that (which I'm sure she will). It seems as though the cast and crew adore her (despite the crap that the UK tabloids threw around) and that counts for a lot in my book.
Personally, I think Billie's massively overrated. I've seen her in a number of other things and she seemed to be exactly the same as Rose in all of them (I haven't seen Secret Diary of a Call Girl yet so can't say). I'm sure she's very nice, seems to be very much in love with her husband (who I adore as an actor), etc. but I don't see her going on to be the next Judi Dench. ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:37 am (UTC)Likewise. A lot of white, blonde women got the "Oh, I wish she was a companion, she'd be so much better than Freema" tag last year, but then, so did the girl playing Tish. I think Martha's offenses were multiple -- she was black, she was educated, she loved the Doctor, she wasn't sufficiently in awe of him. Something to offend everyone, really. Like you said, she couldn't win.
Freema is magnificent and isn't going to just disappear because they think she should.
I agree, and I hope she does get the opportunity to do non-Who things. Bryan Fuller, producer of Heroes, said fanboyish things about her, which made me happy.
Personally, I think Billie's massively overrated. I've seen her in a number of other things and she seemed to be exactly the same as Rose in all of them (I haven't seen Secret Diary of a Call Girl yet so can't say). I'm sure she's very nice, seems to be very much in love with her husband (who I adore as an actor), etc. but I don't see her going on to be the next Judi Dench.
Now, I adore Billie (I thought she was great in Secret Diary of a Call Girl, but I also thought that was a sitcom, when apparently the rest of the world thought it was meant to be a gritty, realistic look at street prostitution...), but she and Freema are totally different in their approaches. Billie, in real life and on screen, wears her heart on her sleeve, whereas Freema seems relatively reserved. I'm really, really eager to see how they work together, late in season four.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 01:07 pm (UTC)" I think Martha's offenses were multiple -- she was black, she was educated, she loved the Doctor, she wasn't sufficiently in awe of him. Something to offend everyone, really. Like you said, she couldn't win."
I think you've just beautifully summed up all the reasons why I liked Martha! (though I don't tend to think of her as black - she's 'British' to me)
Let's hope we get to see more of Freema, both on Who and elsewhere.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:35 am (UTC)I know that a lot of people on cast/crew have accounts at OG/DWF and do read alot of things even when they claim they never go on the internet (*coughDTcough*). I just hope that Freema either ignored the stupid Martha!hate threads or was able to see that the people posting them were idiots.
I have a feeling that part of the reason the Doctor is so apologetic about Martha now is that Russell figured out that the Martha fans were very very unhappy about how things played out. (And I know with absolute authority that he reads quite a lot at DWF)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 10:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:21 pm (UTC)BTW, I hope you don't mind, but I friended you. Your LJ is such a wonderful read.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 07:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 01:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 02:10 pm (UTC)That's one of the things that's great about Donna in TRB. She can be loud and boisterous and kind of caustic... but she's also got this really thoughtful and compassionate side. And she actually openly evaluates the Doctor's actions--rather than being in awe of him--which was something new. There's sooo much more to her than shouting.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 04:34 pm (UTC)But in short. I agree, I don't buy it when someone says Donna is different now, cause she's not! People just hate saying they were wrong, or that they just changed their minds. *lol*
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 06:45 pm (UTC)However, I got good Donna stuff already. Yay! I know it's frustrating for a lot of people that she "was just doing this stuff for the Doctor," but I mean...that was a LOT of effort she put in. She honed a lot of initiative and creativity of her own, and it's...it's almost like being intrigued by the Doctor has turned out beneficially for a character, holy crap New Who! I want to see how she uses these sneaky awesome investigative skills.
Also, though this stuff came about inadvertently due to casting issues and RTD's apparent misconceptions of parent/child relationships, but it turned out well for me: We have here a woman with a broken heart courtesy of her fiance trying to kill her, a lifelong verbally abusive mother, and a recently dead father. That's some fucking spectacular character baggage, man. It makes her make so much sense already, and I hope it'll be used to good affect.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:04 pm (UTC)I want to see how she uses those sneaky investigative skills as well. While I love CT and DT together, I do hope they get separated every now and again so we can see Donna be awesome.
I wouldn't call her mother verbally abusive, but it is clear Donna doesn't get the kind of support from her that she needs. And Donna does have some wonderful character baggage that I hope the writers explore - the large personality is hiding the vulnerability at her core.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:20 pm (UTC)I agree with everything you said. I quite loved Donna in The Runaway Bride and I wished she had said yes, which is why I'm so excited about season four. She was esentially the same character just in a crappy situation. Even the Doctor gets shouty when he's angry.
Also, while we're on that subject, I quite like shouty Doctor. :D
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 09:13 am (UTC)Very interesting post that got me thinking (always a good thing). I have to confess I didn't like Donna much in The Runaway Bride - nor did I like the whole Special for that matter - so seeing her in what I experienced as a toned down form in Partners in Crime was a bit of a relief. I also didn't have the feeling that the writing was intentionally making fun of her, which was something I felt was going on in RB. As you point out, though, I have indeed not rewatched RB, nor do I plan to, so it's very possible that skewers my view. You certainly raise some very good points that would support that interpretation.
I can't really comment on the yelling or Tate's acting, because I never thought that would be a problem. In fact, I didn't notice the former even in RB. I do appreciate that Donna got to tell off Ten in RB, as that did seem a point where the script took her more seriously than during the rest of the Special, and I think that does move smoothly into the characterization seen in PiC.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 02:33 am (UTC)