Tom Jones and Current Projects
Feb. 7th, 2010 12:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I watched The History of Tom Jones a Foundling yesterday, which is one of those mid-nineties BBC costume dramas that the BBC has placed in truly dull DVD packaging that in no way captures the spirit on the programme to scare off any potential viewers. Contrary to the packaging, it is quite fantastic, with an excellent cast and a brilliant sense of humour and considerably more debauchery than the average costume drama. Tom Jones (the gorgeous Max Beesley), a gentleman, bastard and foundling is of course after the love of his life, Sophia (Samantha Morton), but there are quite a few villians in the way, in the forms of James D'Arcy (who doesn't do much, but looks damn good doing it), Lindsay Duncan and Peter Capaldi (both in Dangerous Liaisons mode) and Frances de la Tour and Brian BLESSED (who are hilarious as very loud siblings). Actually, as likable as the heroes are, its the villains that make this prefect. And basically, it's one to track down and watch.
That's great news about Neil Gaiman writing a Who episodes. Not only does the show get some big name actors, it gets the big name writers. Next there will directors lining up.
Having quite a bit of free time at the moment, I've got so many fandom related projects on the go, which would be great if I could seem to focus on one for more than half an hour. There's a picspam for
halfamoon, a TW:CoE vid which is way beyond my skills as a vidder and may take forever, zombie!crack TTOI fic, a TTOI/Doctor Who crossover fic, and a post-EoT Donna fic.
At least I completed one thing and changed my LJ layout, as I was bored with the old one. I went for a TTOI theme, partially inspired by the whole 'Vote Labour, Save Malcolm' thing (the fates of my favourite fictional characters are riding on Gordon Brown winning an election – I'm screwed) Although, I may yet tweak the colours.
Finally, is anybody else having trouble with LJ loading? For a couple of days it's not been loading the blue-sidebar thing, userpics or those little tiny icons by usernames and it's so slow. I'm having the same problem in both Firefox and Safari and I'm trying to locate the source of the problem, me or LJ.
That's great news about Neil Gaiman writing a Who episodes. Not only does the show get some big name actors, it gets the big name writers. Next there will directors lining up.
Having quite a bit of free time at the moment, I've got so many fandom related projects on the go, which would be great if I could seem to focus on one for more than half an hour. There's a picspam for
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
At least I completed one thing and changed my LJ layout, as I was bored with the old one. I went for a TTOI theme, partially inspired by the whole 'Vote Labour, Save Malcolm' thing (the fates of my favourite fictional characters are riding on Gordon Brown winning an election – I'm screwed) Although, I may yet tweak the colours.
Finally, is anybody else having trouble with LJ loading? For a couple of days it's not been loading the blue-sidebar thing, userpics or those little tiny icons by usernames and it's so slow. I'm having the same problem in both Firefox and Safari and I'm trying to locate the source of the problem, me or LJ.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 12:17 am (UTC)Obviously I'm over the moon about Unca Neil writing for DW even if it was the worst kept secret in Whodom. I've got every confidence that it will be good.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 12:26 am (UTC)I'm really curious as to how he will do it. I don't associate NG with science-fiction, he's a lot more urban fantasy, but then stuff like the Weeping Angels was also very urban fantasy like anyway, so maybe it won't be different.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 12:32 am (UTC)Neil has written some science fiction over the years, but definitely more in the science fantasy vein than anything hard core or high tech. I can't even remember *what* to be honest, other than his script for Babylon 5.
Dr Who isn't hard-science fiction either so it should be a good match. Neil is great at character-driven stuff and there's a lot of DW technobabble which might as well be magic (including meeting Satan, dealing with witches etc.) so it's easy enough to tweak. And N's a huge fan of the show so it's all good. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 02:13 am (UTC)It's really odd reading wanky stuff on
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 10:03 am (UTC)I hope that like the Catherine Tate Bitch Storm of 07, by the time S6 rolls around and No-Longer-Called-"The House Of Nothing" airs, the large majority of these idiots are eating huge helpings of crow. (The same goes for the people who have to find fault with anything and everything Matt Smith does because he's Not-David-Tennant. One of the dumbest comments I saw today..."Oh, why couldn't Neil have written for David Tennant? That would've been so much better!" GAH!)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 12:38 am (UTC)I read from someone else on my flist that there are problems on LJ for those in NZ? I'm not sure why? Some server thing? Causing things to be html-like?
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 12:52 am (UTC)I'm surprised I hadn't come across Max Beesley before watching in him this actually. He's very good looking but also really charismatic and charming.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 02:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 04:44 am (UTC)"That's great news about Neil Gaiman writing a Who episodes."
Omg I hadn't heard! Yay! I'm a little pouty he never got to write for Ten, but we will always have that sample ramble XD and it's proof enough that he gets the Doctor's ridiculousness.
Isn't the Thick of It prime minister fictional anyway? They can just stay Labor on the show! No need for Malcolm to lose his job 'cause of a parallel reality.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 05:59 am (UTC)The Thick of It likes to stay very close to reality, particularly since it gets a lot its plotlines ripped from the headlines. It even had two specials airing that covered the PM standing down and being replaced by a new PM at the same time as the Blair-Brown handover. If it didn't change it wouldn't be as relevant and lose a lot of what makes it a brilliant satire.
Although, it would be the end of the world and the re-occurring opposition characters are just as funny, dysfunctional and well drawn as the regular government characters, so a change of government wouldn't be too bad. It's just, I'll miss the current regulars terribly (even if they show up every now and again in reoccurring roles - although I doubt Malcolm would become a re-occurring character, Peter Capaldi seems intent on him going out with a bang, preferably being carried out of Downing Street in a stretcher). And the opposition doesn't have a Malcolm (in that none of the characters is particularly iconic or stand-out) so the show may suffer (They introduced a Malcolm-esq character belonging to the opposition in the last five minutes of the third season finale, the Fucker, but he just served to illustrate that their is only one Malcolm Tucker (which I believe was intentional) and also (and unfortunately for Tom Hollander) there only one Peter Capaldi).
Hmm. Sorry, you got an essay for an answer :) I can love TTOI and could write about it all day.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 06:15 am (UTC)Was that about Hugh stepping down? 'Cause didn't that have to do with the actor's legal troubles?
"Fucker"
Is that short for Fake Tucker? I ask because I just read Juliet, Naked and there was a character named Tucker and he had a friend who pretended to be him and ended up being nicknamed Fake Tucker and eventually Fucker and Malcolm has a convenient last name for this analogy.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 06:32 am (UTC)He's called 'The Fucker' by all the characters in the show (real name Cal Richards) probably in reference to the fact that he tends to yell 'fuck' very, very loudly (which coming from pint-sized Tom Hollander is actually quite funny).
Although, I wouldn't be surprised if something along the lines of Fake Tucker was the thinking behind the character. He's kind of a less articulate, less charming, less charismatic Malcolm and generally what Malcolm would be if the writer's didn't bother giving him dimensions. I'm starting to wonder if he's a spoof of general perception of Malcolm.